Skip to main content

intro.v1

in intellij -- i am using this --- git@github.com:michael-maldo/docker-notes.git

That string is an SSH Git URL.

git@github.com:michael-maldo/docker-notes.git

It means:

git@github.com → connect to GitHub using SSH, as user git

michael-maldo/docker-notes → owner + repository name

.git → the Git repository endpoint

So in IntelliJ (or any Git client), this implies:

You are authenticating via SSH keys, not username/password.

Your machine must have:

an SSH key (~/.ssh/id_rsa or id_ed25519)

the public key added to GitHub → Settings → SSH keys

Practical implications (important)

  1. No browser login needed

Once SSH is set up:

git pull

git push

IntelliJ sync

→ all work without prompts.

  1. This is different from HTTPS

The HTTPS version would be:

https://github.com/michael-maldo/docker-notes.git

That one requires:

either GitHub token

or browser auth popups

SSH is better for DevOps workflows, CI/CD, servers, VPS, etc.

How IntelliJ uses it

When you clone with that URL in IntelliJ:

It runs essentially:

git clone git@github.com:michael-maldo/docker-notes.git

IntelliJ just delegates to your system ssh.

If something breaks, it’s not an IntelliJ problem, it’s almost always:

ssh -T git@github.com

If that fails → SSH setup issue.

Very DevOps-relevant concept

This is the exact same mechanism you’ll use for:

GitHub Actions runners

CI servers

Kubernetes build agents

VPS automation

No passwords, just keys.

Mental model (simple)

Think of it as:

“Log into GitHub as my machine instead of my browser.”

Your laptop/VM is the identity, not you.

That’s why SSH Git URLs are the professional default.

how to setup sshkey access with github?

This is one of those core DevOps skills — once you do this once, you’ll use it everywhere (laptops, VPS, CI runners, cloud VMs).

I’ll give you the clean, modern way (ED25519).

  1. Check if you already have a key ls -la ~/.ssh

If you see something like:

id_ed25519 and id_ed25519.pub → you already have one

id_rsa and id_rsa.pub → older but still works

If not, generate one.

  1. Generate a new SSH key ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -C "michael@github"

Press Enter for:

file location (default is fine)

passphrase (recommended, but optional)

This creates:

~/.ssh/id_ed25519 (private key) ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub (public key)

  1. Start ssh-agent and load key eval "$(ssh-agent -s)" ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_ed25519

Now your key is in memory.

  1. Add public key to GitHub

Copy it:

cat ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub

Then:

GitHub → Profile pic → Settings → SSH and GPG keys → New SSH key

Title: Laptop / VPS / Work PC

Key type: Authentication

Paste the key

  1. Test it ssh -T git@github.com

You should see:

Hi michael-maldo! You've successfully authenticated...

No password. Pure key-based auth.

  1. Use SSH URLs in IntelliJ

Clone with:

git@github.com:michael-maldo/docker-notes.git

or convert existing repo:

git remote set-url origin git@github.com:michael-maldo/docker-notes.git

Common real-world issues 🔹 “Permission denied (publickey)”

Usually means:

key not added to GitHub

ssh-agent not running

wrong key loaded

Check:

ssh-add -l

🔹 Multiple machines (laptop + VPS + cloud)

Each machine should have its own key.

On VPS:

ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -C "vps-prod"

Add that key to GitHub as well.

This is exactly how:

CI/CD runners

Kubernetes nodes

build servers

authenticate.

Pro tip (very DevOps)

Create ~/.ssh/config:

Host github.com User git IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_ed25519

Now SSH is deterministic even with multiple keys.

Why this matters for your career

For someone targeting Cloud / Platform / DevOps roles like you:

SSH keys are used for:

GitHub

GitLab

Bitbucket

Ansible

Terraform

CI agents

Kubernetes nodes

Cloud bastion hosts

It’s basically the Unix equivalent of your passport.

Once you understand SSH keys, half of “mysterious infra auth problems” disappear.

what if i lose the private key on my local machine

Great question — and this is exactly the right level of paranoia for DevOps 😄

Short answer:

If you lose your private key, nothing breaks permanently — you just generate a new one.

There is no way to recover a lost private key. By design.

What actually happens if you lose it?

Say your laptop dies and you lose:

~/.ssh/id_ed25519

But GitHub still has your public key.

Result:

You can no longer authenticate from that machine.

GitHub is still secure.

Nobody can “recreate” your private key.

This is good security.

The recovery process (normal workflow)

From a new machine:

  1. Generate new key ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -C "new-laptop"

  2. Add new public key to GitHub

GitHub → Settings → SSH keys → New key

  1. Remove old key (optional but recommended)

Delete the lost one from GitHub.

Done. You're back in business.

Important: GitHub is NOT tied to a single key

You can have:

5 machines

10 keys

1 GitHub account

Each key is independent.

This is how companies manage:

dev laptops

CI runners

prod servers

Worst case scenario

The only real danger is:

If someone steals your private key and your machine is compromised.

Then they can push code as you.

Which is why:

passphrases matter

removing old keys matters

one key per machine matters

Professional-grade practices (what seniors do)

  1. One key per device

Never reuse the same key across machines.

Good:

Laptop → id_ed25519_laptop VPS → id_ed25519_vps CI → id_ed25519_ci

  1. Descriptive names on GitHub

Instead of:

id_ed25519

Use:

MacBook-Pro-2024 AWS-Build-Runner Home-PC

So when something dies → you know what to delete.

  1. Passphrase + ssh-agent

Your private key on disk is encrypted. Agent decrypts it in memory only.

This protects you even if disk is stolen.

  1. For servers: no backups of private keys

Never:

email them

put them in Dropbox

commit them (obviously)

If a server is destroyed:

generate a new key

add it to GitHub

move on

This is the intended lifecycle.

Mental model (important)

Think of SSH keys like physical locks:

Public key = lock on the door (GitHub)

Private key = your key

Lose the key? → Replace the lock. → Make a new key.

You don't panic. You rotate credentials.

That’s literally how real infrastructure works.

Why this is actually good news

Because in real cloud work:

Instances are ephemeral

CI runners are disposable

Laptops get replaced

Containers die constantly

SSH keys are designed for loss, rotation, and renewal.

If losing a key were catastrophic, modern cloud would be impossible.

One-liner summary

Losing your private key is not a disaster. It’s just a credential rotation event. Generate a new one, add it, delete the old one, continue life.

can the public key be used by other machines?

Yes — but not in the way people often think.

Short answer:

The public key can be copied to any number of machines, but it is useless without the matching private key.

What the public key actually does

The public key is just:

“I will accept logins from whoever proves they own the matching private key.”

It’s a lock, not a key.

Anyone can:

see it

copy it

store it

publish it

And it gives them zero power.

Can other machines use my public key?

They can store it, yes. They cannot authenticate with it.

Because authentication requires:

public key (on GitHub) + private key (on your machine)

Without the private key: → mathematically impossible to log in.

Typical real-world layouts GitHub side (server)

Stores:

id_ed25519.pub

Your laptop

Stores:

id_ed25519 (secret)

When you run:

git push

GitHub sends a challenge: Your machine signs it with the private key. GitHub verifies with the public key.

At no point is the private key transmitted.

Important implication (security)

This is why it’s safe to:

paste public keys on websites

commit them in repos

send them in Slack

And why it’s catastrophic to leak:

~/.ssh/id_ed25519

DevOps best practice (this matters)

Even though you could:

copy the same private key to 5 machines

You should never do this.

Because:

you lose traceability

you can't revoke one device

one compromise breaks all

Instead:

Machine Key Laptop id_ed25519_laptop VPS id_ed25519_vps CI runner id_ed25519_ci

All have different private keys. All public keys live on GitHub.

Subtle but powerful concept

Public keys are often treated as:

identities of machines

Not people.

In real infra:

GitHub doesn't know "Michael"

It knows "this cryptographic entity is allowed"

That's why SSH scales to:

millions of servers

zero shared secrets

no passwords

Final mental model

Public key = padlock Private key = the only physical key

You can give everyone the padlock. Only one person can open it.

so if you will multiple private keys -- thenm that corresponds to multiple public keys -- as key pairs

Exactly. 💯 You’ve got it.

Each private key always has exactly one matching public key. That pair is a cryptographic identity.

So:

1 private key → 1 public key → 1 identity

5 private keys → 5 public keys → 5 identities

These are called key pairs.

How this looks in practice

On disk:

~/.ssh/id_ed25519_laptop (private) ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_laptop.pub (public)

~/.ssh/id_ed25519_vps ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_vps.pub

On GitHub:

MacBook-Pro-2024 AWS-VPS CI-Runner

Each line is one public key.

This is why SSH is so powerful

You are not logging in as:

michael / password

You are logging in as:

cryptographic entity #A7F3C9...

Which happens to be on your laptop.

Important invariant (never breaks)

You can derive the public key from the private key. You can NEVER derive the private key from the public key.

One-way math.

That’s the entire security model.

Advanced but very real DevOps detail

You can even regenerate a public key from a private one:

ssh-keygen -y -f id_ed25519_laptop > id_ed25519_laptop.pub

Meaning:

private key is the source of truth

public key is just a projection

Why seniors insist on one key per machine

Because a key pair = identity.

So if:

a laptop is stolen → revoke only that key

a CI runner is compromised → revoke only that key

a VPS is destroyed → delete only that key

Zero blast radius.

This maps perfectly to cloud concepts

SSH key pairs are basically:

AWS IAM users (but simpler)

GCP service accounts (but local)

Kubernetes cert identities

mTLS certificates

Same pattern:

one identity = one key pair

One-liner that’s worth memorising

Multiple private keys ⇒ multiple public keys ⇒ multiple identities. One key pair = one cryptographic “user”.

at the end of the day --- it is having idividual acoounts -- on ssh keys

Yes — that’s a very good way to think about it. And in fact, that’s exactly how modern systems treat it.

SSH keys are basically individual accounts, just without usernames and passwords.

The real model (what’s actually happening)

In old systems:

username + password = identity

In modern systems:

private key = identity public key = account record

There is no “user” in the human sense. There is only:

“This cryptographic entity is allowed.”

Why this is even better than accounts

Traditional accounts:

need password resets

can be phished

reused everywhere

stored on servers (hashed, but still)

SSH identities:

never transmit secrets

cannot be brute-forced

cannot be guessed

live only on the client

The server (GitHub, Linux, CI) only stores:

a list of trusted public keys

That’s it.

This is literally how cloud works

When you:

ssh ubuntu@ec2-instance

GitHub Actions deploy

Kubernetes node joins cluster

Terraform talks to cloud API

They are not users.

They are:

machine identities with key pairs

Why this mindset is important for you (DevOps)

Because once you see SSH keys as “accounts”, everything clicks:

Concept Old world Modern world Login password private key Account user key pair Revoke access disable user delete public key Audit who logged in which key was used Zero trust impossible native Even more precise mental model

SSH key = service account

Not human. Not personal. Not emotional.

Just:

a cryptographic actor with permissions.

This is why infra feels different from app dev

In app dev you think:

users, sessions, cookies

In infra you think:

identities, trust, keys, certificates

No humans involved.

One sentence that sums it up

SSH keys are individual accounts, but the “person” is a machine, not you.+--++++